AI Battle > Rankings > AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown

AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown Ranking — eval omniscience (2026)

GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI leads the AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown ranking with a score of 0.11. The ranking covers 20 evaluated eval omniscience from a public dataset that AI Battle re-checks daily.

Last updated: . Source: public benchmark datasets and provider pricing, aggregated daily; 20 entries shown.

GLM-5.3-Flash0.11gpt-oss-120b (high)0.11Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)0.47Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite0.22Muse Glimmer (high)0.11MiniMax-M30.22Grok 4.6 (high)1.77DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)0.26GPT-5.6 Luna (max)0.14Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)0.51GLM-5.3 (max)1.07DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)1.65Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)0.54Mistral Medium 3.51.06GPT-6 Astra (medium)7.41Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High E9.88Inkling (xhigh)0.78Muse Spark 1.3 (max)0.92Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effor5.13GPT-6 Astra (high)7.41
Every entry in the dataset, scaled from the smallest to the largest published value.

All 20 entries in this dataset

#EntryCreatorValueΔ vs #1
1GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI0.110.0%
2gpt-oss-120b (high)OpenAI0.11-4.4%
3Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)NVIDIA0.47319.8%
4Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle0.2292.2%
5Muse Glimmer (high)Meta0.11-5.8%
6MiniMax-M3MiniMax0.2290.8%
7Grok 4.6 (high)SpaceXAI1.771475.0%
8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)DeepSeek0.26127.4%
9GPT-5.6 Luna (max)OpenAI0.1427.3%
10Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)Alibaba0.51352.9%
11GLM-5.3 (max)Z AI1.07846.0%
12DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)DeepSeek1.651364.2%
13Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Google0.54380.4%
14Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral1.06843.4%
15GPT-6 Astra (medium)OpenAI7.416475.7%
16Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic9.888668.9%
17Inkling (xhigh)Thinking Machines0.78594.8%
18Muse Spark 1.3 (max)Meta0.92717.4%
19Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Anthropic5.134450.8%
20GPT-6 Astra (high)OpenAI7.416475.7%

How the values are distributed

Across the 20 numeric entries in this window the median is 0.66 and the mean is 1.99, so the typical entry sits 0.55 above the leader. The window spans 0.11 to 9.88.

142001201
8 equal buckets between the smallest (0.11) and largest (9.88) value; numbers under bars are entry counts.

10 of 20 entries are at or above the median, and the top three hold 62% of the combined value — read it against the metric below, since a higher number is not "better" for every dataset.

Creators in this ranking

12 creators appear in this window; the three most-represented hold 40% of the entries.

CreatorEntriesHighest valueTop entry
OpenAI47.41GPT-6 Astra (medium)
Anthropic29.88Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)
DeepSeek21.65DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Z AI21.07GLM-5.3 (max)
Meta20.92Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
Google20.54Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
SpaceXAI11.77Grok 4.6 (high)
Mistral11.06Mistral Medium 3.5
Thinking Machines10.78Inkling (xhigh)
Alibaba10.51Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
NVIDIA10.47Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
MiniMax10.22MiniMax-M3

Where these models appear in other rankings

The same models are measured across multiple independent datasets. Aggregating the 20 entries above against every other AI Battle dataset gives this cross-section, computed by AI Battle and published nowhere upstream:

ModelDatasetsBest placements elsewhere
GLM-5.3-Flash54#1/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output, #1/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output, #1/20 in GDPval-AA v2: Average Turns per Task
gpt-oss-120b (high)39#1/20 in Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, #1/20 in Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, #1/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Cost per Task
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)46#1/12 in Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score, #1/12 in Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Components, #2/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Time per Task
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite44#1/20 in End-to-End Response Time, #1/20 in Output Speed, #1/20 in Time per Intelligence Index Task
Muse Glimmer (high)43#1/20 in Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task, #1/20 in Cost per Intelligence Index Task, #1/20 in Cost per Intelligence Index Task
MiniMax-M357#1/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #1/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #4/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Grok 4.6 (high)61#2/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score, #5/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #5/20 in AA-Omniscience Index
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)56#3/20 in End-to-End Response Time, #3/20 in Latency: Time To First Answer Token, #2/11 in Cost per Task
GPT-5.6 Luna (max)58#1/11 in Cost per Task, #1/11 in Cost per Task, #3/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)43#6/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #6/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score, #8/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Cost per Task
GLM-5.3 (max)57#3/20 in AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task, #4/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard, #4/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)59#3/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters, #3/12 in Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score, #3/11 in Cost per Task
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)60#1/11 in Speed, #1/11 in Speed, #2/20 in Output Speed
Mistral Medium 3.541#2/20 in GDPval-AA v2: Output Tokens per Task, #3/20 in Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task, #3/20 in Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
GPT-6 Astra (medium)12#1/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Token Usage, #1/19 in MMMU-Pro: Token Usage, #2/20 in Terminal-Bench v4.0: Output Tokens per Task
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)22#1/20 in SciCode: Output Tokens per Task, #2/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Token Usage, #2/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task
Inkling (xhigh)52#3/20 in Context Window, #3/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #5/20 in AA-Briefcase Output Tokens per Task
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)61#3/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #3/20 in Output Speed, #3/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)44#2/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #2/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard, #2/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo
GPT-6 Astra (high)12#1/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Score, #2/19 in MMMU-Pro: Token Usage, #2/19 in MMMU-Pro: Score

Metric reference

This ranking carries the metrics answerCost, inputCost, reasoningCost from the AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown dataset in the tab::eval-omniscience family. Units and the direction of "better" are not declared by the source dataset, so AI Battle does not invent them: values are shown exactly as published, and the ordering is the source dataset's own.

How this ranking is built

Rebuilt on from the public dataset AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown (family tab::eval-omniscience). The source lists 20 entries and all 20 are shown here. AI Battle requests the dataset's rows, keeps the ordering the source publishes, and computes only the statistics on this page: median, mean, spread, the #1–#2 gap, the creator breakdown and the raw-data file. Nothing on this page is generated text about the entries — the numbers come from the source.

Refresh cadence: every deploy re-pulls the dataset, so this page tracks the source's own update cycle. Corrections: see the methodology page.

Limitations

Raw data

Machine-readable copy of this table, with the statistics below and the source provenance: /data/rankings/eval-omniscience-aa-omniscience-index-cost-breakdown.json. Free to reuse with attribution to AI Battle and the source dataset.

FAQ — AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown

What is the best model for AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown in 2026?

GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI currently leads the AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown ranking with a score of 0.11, the highest value in this dataset across eval omniscience. AI Battle aggregates the dataset from its public source and re-checks it daily.

How often is the AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown ranking updated?

The AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown ranking is rebuilt daily from the upstream public dataset. Scores are the source dataset's own published values, so positions track whatever that source last released — each ranking page names the dataset it comes from.

Which models rank in the top 3 for AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown?

The top 3 are: 1. GLM-5.3-Flash (0.11), 2. gpt-oss-120b (high) (0.11), 3. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) (0.47).

All AI Battle Rankings

Directories