AI Battle > Rankings > AA-LCR v1.1: Score

AA-LCR v1.1: Score Ranking — eval lcr (2026)

Kimi K3 (max) by Kimi leads the AA-LCR v1.1: Score ranking with a score of 0.89. The ranking covers 20 evaluated eval lcr from a public dataset that AI Battle re-checks daily.

Last updated: . Source: public benchmark datasets and provider pricing, aggregated daily; 20 entries shown.

Kimi K3 (max)0.89Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Ef0.85Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium0.85GPT-5.5 (xhigh)0.84GPT-5.5 (high)0.84GPT-5.6 Sol (max)0.84Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)0.84DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)0.84Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High E0.84GPT-5.6 Luna (max)0.84Muse Glimmer (high)0.83Muse Spark 1.3 (max)0.83GPT-5.6 Terra (max)0.83MiniMax-M30.83Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effo0.82Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)0.82Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)0.81GPT-6 Astra (max)0.81Grok 4.6 (high)0.80Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B0.80
Every entry in the dataset, scaled from the smallest to the largest published value.

All 20 entries in this dataset

#EntryCreatorValueΔ vs #1
1Kimi K3 (max)Kimi0.890.0%
2Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic0.85-3.8%
3Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic0.85-4.5%
4GPT-5.5 (xhigh)OpenAI0.84-4.9%
5GPT-5.5 (high)OpenAI0.84-4.9%
6GPT-5.6 Sol (max)OpenAI0.84-5.3%
7Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)Google0.84-5.3%
8DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)DeepSeek0.84-5.3%
9Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic0.84-5.6%
10GPT-5.6 Luna (max)OpenAI0.84-5.6%
11Muse Glimmer (high)Meta0.83-6.0%
12Muse Spark 1.3 (max)Meta0.83-6.4%
13GPT-5.6 Terra (max)OpenAI0.83-6.4%
14MiniMax-M3MiniMax0.83-6.4%
15Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)Anthropic0.82-7.1%
16Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)Alibaba0.82-7.5%
17Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Google0.81-8.3%
18GPT-6 Astra (max)OpenAI0.81-9.0%
19Grok 4.6 (high)SpaceXAI0.80-9.4%
20Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba0.80-9.4%

How the values are distributed

Across the 20 numeric entries in this window the median is 0.83 and the mean is 0.83, so the typical entry sits 0.05 below the leader. The window spans 0.80 to 0.89.

42472001
8 equal buckets between the smallest (0.80) and largest (0.89) value; numbers under bars are entry counts.

10 of 20 entries are at or above the median, and the top three hold 16% of the combined value — read it against the metric below, since a higher number is not "better" for every dataset.

Creators in this ranking

9 creators appear in this window; the three most-represented hold 60% of the entries.

CreatorEntriesHighest valueTop entry
OpenAI60.84GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
Anthropic40.85Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
Google20.84Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)
Meta20.83Muse Glimmer (high)
Alibaba20.82Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
Kimi10.89Kimi K3 (max)
DeepSeek10.84DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
MiniMax10.83MiniMax-M3
SpaceXAI10.80Grok 4.6 (high)

Where these models appear in other rankings

The same models are measured across multiple independent datasets. Aggregating the 20 entries above against every other AI Battle dataset gives this cross-section, computed by AI Battle and published nowhere upstream:

ModelDatasetsBest placements elsewhere
Kimi K3 (max)60#1/20 in Context Window, #1/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters, #4/20 in SciCode: Output Tokens per Task
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)36#1/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #1/20 in AA-Omniscience Index, #1/20 in Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)7#1/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Output Tokens per Task, #1/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task, #2/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Time per Task
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)3#9/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task, #11/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Time per Task
GPT-5.5 (high)3#4/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task, #6/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Time per Task
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)56#3/20 in SciCode: Output Tokens per Task, #4/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #5/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task
Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)3#10/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Cost per Task, #18/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)56#3/20 in End-to-End Response Time, #3/20 in Latency: Time To First Answer Token, #2/11 in Cost per Task
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)22#1/20 in SciCode: Output Tokens per Task, #2/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Token Usage, #2/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task
GPT-5.6 Luna (max)58#1/11 in Cost per Task, #1/11 in Cost per Task, #3/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Muse Glimmer (high)43#1/20 in Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task, #1/20 in Cost per Intelligence Index Task, #1/20 in Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)61#3/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #3/20 in Output Speed, #3/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard
GPT-5.6 Terra (max)52#7/20 in AA-Briefcase Output Tokens per Task, #8/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Output Tokens per Task, #9/20 in Output Speed
MiniMax-M357#1/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #1/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #4/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)40#2/20 in SciCode: Score, #3/20 in AA-Omniscience Index, #3/20 in AA-Omniscience Index
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)43#6/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #6/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score, #8/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Cost per Task
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)60#1/11 in Speed, #1/11 in Speed, #2/20 in Output Speed
GPT-6 Astra (max)51#1/19 in MMMU-Pro: Score, #2/20 in AA-Omniscience Index, #2/20 in Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Grok 4.6 (high)61#2/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score, #5/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #5/20 in AA-Omniscience Index
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B43#2/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters, #5/20 in AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task, #5/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score

Metric reference

This ranking carries the metric AA-LCR v1.1 from the AA-LCR v1.1: Score dataset in the tab::eval-lcr family. Units and the direction of "better" are not declared by the source dataset, so AI Battle does not invent them: values are shown exactly as published, and the ordering is the source dataset's own.

How this ranking is built

Rebuilt on from the public dataset AA-LCR v1.1: Score (family tab::eval-lcr). The source lists 20 entries and all 20 are shown here. AI Battle requests the dataset's rows, keeps the ordering the source publishes, and computes only the statistics on this page: median, mean, spread, the #1–#2 gap, the creator breakdown and the raw-data file. Nothing on this page is generated text about the entries — the numbers come from the source.

Refresh cadence: every deploy re-pulls the dataset, so this page tracks the source's own update cycle. Corrections: see the methodology page.

Limitations

Raw data

Machine-readable copy of this table, with the statistics below and the source provenance: /data/rankings/eval-lcr-aa-lcr-v1-1-score.json. Free to reuse with attribution to AI Battle and the source dataset.

FAQ — AA-LCR v1.1: Score

What is the best model for AA-LCR v1.1: Score in 2026?

Kimi K3 (max) by Kimi currently leads the AA-LCR v1.1: Score ranking with a score of 0.89, the highest value in this dataset across eval lcr. AI Battle aggregates the dataset from its public source and re-checks it daily.

How often is the AA-LCR v1.1: Score ranking updated?

The AA-LCR v1.1: Score ranking is rebuilt daily from the upstream public dataset. Scores are the source dataset's own published values, so positions track whatever that source last released — each ranking page names the dataset it comes from.

Which models rank in the top 3 for AA-LCR v1.1: Score?

The top 3 are: 1. Kimi K3 (max) (0.89), 2. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) (0.85), 3. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) (0.85).

All AI Battle Rankings

Directories