AI Battle > Rankings > AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task

AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task Ranking — eval lcr (2026)

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) by Anthropic leads the AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task ranking with a score of 400. The ranking covers 20 evaluated eval lcr from a public dataset that AI Battle re-checks daily.

Last updated: . Source: public benchmark datasets and provider pricing, aggregated daily; 20 entries shown.

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium400Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High E417GPT-6 Astra (max)90.7GPT-5.5 (high)122GPT-5.6 Sol (max)74.9MiniMax-M3160Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B235Kimi K3 (max)110GPT-5.5 (xhigh)113GPT-5.6 Luna (max)80.8Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effor595gpt-oss-120b (high)131GPT-5.6 Terra (max)88.0K2 Horizon 375B A23B12.4Grok 4.6 (high)80.9Inkling (xhigh)150Muse Glimmer (high)316Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)227Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite176GLM-5.3 (max)102
Every entry in the dataset, scaled from the smallest to the largest published value.

All 20 entries in this dataset

#EntryCreatorValueΔ vs #1
1Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic4000.0%
2Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic4174.3%
3GPT-6 Astra (max)OpenAI90.7-77.3%
4GPT-5.5 (high)OpenAI122-69.5%
5GPT-5.6 Sol (max)OpenAI74.9-81.3%
6MiniMax-M3MiniMax160-59.9%
7Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba235-41.4%
8Kimi K3 (max)Kimi110-72.4%
9GPT-5.5 (xhigh)OpenAI113-71.6%
10GPT-5.6 Luna (max)OpenAI80.8-79.8%
11Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Anthropic59548.6%
12gpt-oss-120b (high)OpenAI131-67.2%
13GPT-5.6 Terra (max)OpenAI88.0-78.0%
14K2 Horizon 375B A23BMBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models12.4-96.9%
15Grok 4.6 (high)SpaceXAI80.9-79.8%
16Inkling (xhigh)Thinking Machines150-62.5%
17Muse Glimmer (high)Meta316-21.1%
18Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)Google227-43.4%
19Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGoogle176-55.9%
20GLM-5.3 (max)Z AI102-74.5%

How the values are distributed

Across the 20 numeric entries in this window the median is 127 and the mean is 184, so the typical entry sits 273 below the leader. The window spans 12.4 to 595.

48311201
8 equal buckets between the smallest (12.4) and largest (595) value; numbers under bars are entry counts.

10 of 20 entries are at or above the median, and the top three hold 38% of the combined value — read it against the metric below, since a higher number is not "better" for every dataset.

Creators in this ranking

11 creators appear in this window; the three most-represented hold 60% of the entries.

CreatorEntriesHighest valueTop entry
OpenAI7131gpt-oss-120b (high)
Anthropic3595Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Google2227Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)
Meta1316Muse Glimmer (high)
Alibaba1235Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
MiniMax1160MiniMax-M3
Thinking Machines1150Inkling (xhigh)
Kimi1110Kimi K3 (max)
Z AI1102GLM-5.3 (max)
SpaceXAI180.9Grok 4.6 (high)
MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models112.4K2 Horizon 375B A23B

Where these models appear in other rankings

The same models are measured across multiple independent datasets. Aggregating the 20 entries above against every other AI Battle dataset gives this cross-section, computed by AI Battle and published nowhere upstream:

ModelDatasetsBest placements elsewhere
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)7#1/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Output Tokens per Task, #2/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Time per Task, #3/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Score
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)22#1/20 in SciCode: Output Tokens per Task, #2/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Token Usage, #2/20 in SciCode: Time per Task
GPT-6 Astra (max)51#1/19 in MMMU-Pro: Score, #2/20 in AA-Omniscience Index, #2/20 in Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
GPT-5.5 (high)3#5/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Score, #6/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Time per Task
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)56#3/20 in SciCode: Output Tokens per Task, #4/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #6/20 in Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
MiniMax-M357#1/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #1/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #4/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B43#2/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters, #5/20 in AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task, #5/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score
Kimi K3 (max)60#1/20 in Context Window, #1/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Score, #1/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
GPT-5.5 (xhigh)3#4/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Score, #11/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Time per Task
GPT-5.6 Luna (max)58#1/11 in Cost per Task, #1/11 in Cost per Task, #3/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)44#2/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #2/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard, #2/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo
gpt-oss-120b (high)39#1/20 in Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, #1/20 in Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, #1/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Cost per Task
GPT-5.6 Terra (max)52#7/20 in AA-Briefcase Output Tokens per Task, #8/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Output Tokens per Task, #9/20 in Output Speed
K2 Horizon 375B A23B24#2/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #8/20 in AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task, #12/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Token Usage
Grok 4.6 (high)61#2/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score, #5/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #5/20 in AA-Omniscience Index
Inkling (xhigh)52#3/20 in Context Window, #3/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #5/20 in AA-Briefcase Output Tokens per Task
Muse Glimmer (high)43#1/20 in Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task, #1/20 in Cost per Intelligence Index Task, #1/20 in Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)3#7/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Score, #10/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Cost per Task
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite44#1/20 in End-to-End Response Time, #1/20 in Output Speed, #1/20 in Time per Intelligence Index Task
GLM-5.3 (max)57#3/20 in AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task, #4/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard, #4/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate

Metric reference

This ranking carries the metrics answer, reasoning from the AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task dataset in the tab::eval-lcr family. Units and the direction of "better" are not declared by the source dataset, so AI Battle does not invent them: values are shown exactly as published, and the ordering is the source dataset's own.

How this ranking is built

Rebuilt on from the public dataset AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task (family tab::eval-lcr). The source lists 20 entries and all 20 are shown here. AI Battle requests the dataset's rows, keeps the ordering the source publishes, and computes only the statistics on this page: median, mean, spread, the #1–#2 gap, the creator breakdown and the raw-data file. Nothing on this page is generated text about the entries — the numbers come from the source.

Refresh cadence: every deploy re-pulls the dataset, so this page tracks the source's own update cycle. Corrections: see the methodology page.

Limitations

Raw data

Machine-readable copy of this table, with the statistics below and the source provenance: /data/rankings/eval-lcr-aa-lcr-v1-1-output-tokens-per-task.json. Free to reuse with attribution to AI Battle and the source dataset.

FAQ — AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task

What is the best model for AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task in 2026?

Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) by Anthropic currently leads the AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task ranking with a score of 400, the highest value in this dataset across eval lcr. AI Battle aggregates the dataset from its public source and re-checks it daily.

How often is the AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task ranking updated?

The AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task ranking is rebuilt daily from the upstream public dataset. Scores are the source dataset's own published values, so positions track whatever that source last released — each ranking page names the dataset it comes from.

Which models rank in the top 3 for AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task?

The top 3 are: 1. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback) (400), 2. Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback) (417), 3. GPT-6 Astra (max) (90.7).

All AI Battle Rankings

Directories