AI Battle > Rankings > AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task

AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task Ranking — eval briefcase (2026)

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba leads the AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task ranking with a score of 137. The ranking covers 20 evaluated eval briefcase from a public dataset that AI Battle re-checks daily.

Last updated: . Source: public benchmark datasets and provider pricing, aggregated daily; 20 entries shown.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next137GLM-5.3-Flash81.0GLM-5.3 (max)80.1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)73.6Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B80.4Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effor58.8Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Ef58.3K2 Horizon 375B A23B64.0Kimi K3 (max)54.4Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)52.1Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Eff49.8Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh 50.0MiniMax-M351.2Muse Spark 1.3 (max)42.5GPT-5.6 Luna (max)47.4Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effo41.8Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effo40.9DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)51.1Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)31.2GPT-5.6 Sol (max)40.6
Every entry in the dataset, scaled from the smallest to the largest published value.

All 20 entries in this dataset

#EntryCreatorValueΔ vs #1
1Qwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba1370.0%
2GLM-5.3-FlashZ AI81.0-40.9%
3GLM-5.3 (max)Z AI80.1-41.6%
4DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)DeepSeek73.6-46.4%
5Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba80.4-41.4%
6Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Anthropic58.8-57.1%
7Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic58.3-57.5%
8K2 Horizon 375B A23BMBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models64.0-53.4%
9Kimi K3 (max)Kimi54.4-60.3%
10Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)Alibaba52.1-62.0%
11Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)Anthropic49.8-63.7%
12Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic50.0-63.5%
13MiniMax-M3MiniMax51.2-62.7%
14Muse Spark 1.3 (max)Meta42.5-69.0%
15GPT-5.6 Luna (max)OpenAI47.4-65.4%
16Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)Anthropic41.8-69.5%
17Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)Anthropic40.9-70.1%
18DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)DeepSeek51.1-62.8%
19Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Google31.2-77.2%
20GPT-5.6 Sol (max)OpenAI40.6-70.4%

How the values are distributed

Across the 20 numeric entries in this window the median is 51.6 and the mean is 59.3, so the typical entry sits 85.5 below the leader. The window spans 31.2 to 137.

57340001
8 equal buckets between the smallest (31.2) and largest (137) value; numbers under bars are entry counts.

10 of 20 entries are at or above the median, and the top three hold 25% of the combined value — read it against the metric below, since a higher number is not "better" for every dataset.

Creators in this ranking

10 creators appear in this window; the three most-represented hold 55% of the entries.

CreatorEntriesHighest valueTop entry
Anthropic658.8Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Alibaba3137Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Z AI281.0GLM-5.3-Flash
DeepSeek273.6DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
OpenAI247.4GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models164.0K2 Horizon 375B A23B
Kimi154.4Kimi K3 (max)
MiniMax151.2MiniMax-M3
Meta142.5Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
Google131.2Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)

Where these models appear in other rankings

The same models are measured across multiple independent datasets. Aggregating the 20 entries above against every other AI Battle dataset gives this cross-section, computed by AI Battle and published nowhere upstream:

ModelDatasetsBest placements elsewhere
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next5#1/20 in Mean Turns per Task, #6/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #8/20 in AA-Briefcase Rubric Pass Rate by File Type (Normalized)
GLM-5.3-Flash54#1/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output, #1/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output, #1/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Cost Breakdown
GLM-5.3 (max)57#4/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard, #4/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #4/20 in Mean Turns per Task
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)56#3/20 in End-to-End Response Time, #3/20 in Latency: Time To First Answer Token, #2/11 in Cost per Task
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B43#2/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters, #5/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score, #6/20 in GDPval-AA v2: Average Turns per Task
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)44#2/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #2/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard, #2/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)36#1/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #1/20 in AA-Omniscience Index, #1/20 in Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
K2 Horizon 375B A23B24#2/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #12/20 in AA-Omniscience Index: Token Usage, #9/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Kimi K3 (max)60#1/20 in Context Window, #1/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Score, #1/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)43#6/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #6/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Score, #8/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Cost per Task
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)11#4/20 in AA-Briefcase Rubric Pass Rate by File Type (Normalized), #4/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #4/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard
Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)20#2/20 in Humanity's Last Exam: Score, #2/20 in AA-Omniscience Accuracy, #2/20 in AA-Briefcase Rubric Pass Rate by File Type (Normalized)
MiniMax-M357#1/20 in AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate, #1/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #4/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)61#3/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #3/20 in Output Speed, #3/20 in GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard
GPT-5.6 Luna (max)58#1/11 in Cost per Task, #1/11 in Cost per Task, #3/20 in Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)6#9/20 in AA-Briefcase Rubric Pass Rate by File Type (Normalized), #9/20 in AA-Briefcase Elo, #15/20 in Time per Task
Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)40#2/20 in SciCode: Score, #3/20 in AA-Omniscience Index, #3/20 in AA-Omniscience Index
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)59#3/14 in Model Size: Total and Active Parameters, #3/12 in Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score, #3/11 in Cost per Task
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)60#1/11 in Speed, #1/11 in Speed, #2/20 in Output Speed
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)56#3/20 in SciCode: Output Tokens per Task, #4/20 in 𝜏³-Banking: Output Tokens per Task, #5/20 in AA-LCR v1.1: Output Tokens per Task

Metric reference

This ranking carries the metrics compute, explore, other, read, viewImage, write from the AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task dataset in the tab::eval-briefcase family. Units and the direction of "better" are not declared by the source dataset, so AI Battle does not invent them: values are shown exactly as published, and the ordering is the source dataset's own.

How this ranking is built

Rebuilt on from the public dataset AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task (family tab::eval-briefcase). The source lists 20 entries and all 20 are shown here. AI Battle requests the dataset's rows, keeps the ordering the source publishes, and computes only the statistics on this page: median, mean, spread, the #1–#2 gap, the creator breakdown and the raw-data file. Nothing on this page is generated text about the entries — the numbers come from the source.

Refresh cadence: every deploy re-pulls the dataset, so this page tracks the source's own update cycle. Corrections: see the methodology page.

Limitations

Raw data

Machine-readable copy of this table, with the statistics below and the source provenance: /data/rankings/eval-briefcase-aa-briefcase-tool-calls-breakdown-avg-per-task.json. Free to reuse with attribution to AI Battle and the source dataset.

FAQ — AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task

What is the best model for AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task in 2026?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba currently leads the AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task ranking with a score of 137, the highest value in this dataset across eval briefcase. AI Battle aggregates the dataset from its public source and re-checks it daily.

How often is the AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task ranking updated?

The AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task ranking is rebuilt daily from the upstream public dataset. Scores are the source dataset's own published values, so positions track whatever that source last released — each ranking page names the dataset it comes from.

Which models rank in the top 3 for AA-Briefcase Tool Calls Breakdown, Avg per Task?

The top 3 are: 1. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (137), 2. GLM-5.3-Flash (81.0), 3. GLM-5.3 (max) (80.1).

All AI Battle Rankings

Directories