AI Battle > Rankings > Feature score of Paid Plans

Feature score of Paid Plans Ranking — AI Chatbots (2026)

null by null leads the Feature score of Paid Plans ranking with a score of 5.70. The ranking covers 12 evaluated ai chatbots from a public dataset that AI Battle re-checks daily.

Last updated: . Source: public benchmark datasets and provider pricing, aggregated daily; 12 entries shown.

ChatGPT Pro5.70ChatGPT Plus5.70SuperGrok Plus5.60SuperGrok5.60Claude Pro4.85Claude Max4.85Mistral Vibe Pro4.75Google AI Pro4.50Google AI Ultra4.50Perplexity Pro3.75Perplexity Max3.75Poe Pro2.55
Every entry in the dataset, scaled from the smallest to the largest published value.

All 12 entries in this dataset

#EntryCreatorValueΔ vs #1
1ChatGPT Pro5.700.0%
2ChatGPT Plus5.700.0%
3SuperGrok Plus5.60-1.8%
4SuperGrok5.60-1.8%
5Claude Pro4.85-14.9%
6Claude Max4.85-14.9%
7Mistral Vibe Pro4.75-16.7%
8Google AI Pro4.50-21.1%
9Google AI Ultra4.50-21.1%
10Perplexity Pro3.75-34.2%
11Perplexity Max3.75-34.2%
12Poe Pro2.55-55.3%

How the values are distributed

Across the 12 numeric entries in this window the median is 4.80 and the mean is 4.67, so the typical entry sits 0.90 below the leader. The window spans 2.55 to 5.70.

10022304
8 equal buckets between the smallest (2.55) and largest (5.70) value; numbers under bars are entry counts.

6 of 12 entries are at or above the median, and the top three hold 30% of the combined value — read it against the metric below, since a higher number is not "better" for every dataset.

Who publishes these entries

The source dataset for this family does not publish a provider or creator label per entry, so AI Battle cannot group them: the table above is the complete published list. Where the dataset does carry a label (model, gateway and tool families do), this section names the creators and how many entries each holds.

Metric reference

This ranking carries the metric featuresScore from the Feature score of Paid Plans dataset in the tab::agents-chatbots family. Units and the direction of "better" are not declared by the source dataset, so AI Battle does not invent them: values are shown exactly as published, and the ordering is the source dataset's own.

How this ranking is built

Rebuilt on from the public dataset Feature score of Paid Plans (family tab::agents-chatbots). The source lists 12 entries and all 12 are shown here. AI Battle requests the dataset's rows, keeps the ordering the source publishes, and computes only the statistics on this page: median, mean, spread, the #1–#2 gap, the creator breakdown and the raw-data file. Nothing on this page is generated text about the entries — the numbers come from the source.

Refresh cadence: every deploy re-pulls the dataset, so this page tracks the source's own update cycle. Corrections: see the methodology page.

Limitations

Raw data

Machine-readable copy of this table, with the statistics below and the source provenance: /data/rankings/agents-chatbots-feature-score-of-paid-plans.json. Free to reuse with attribution to AI Battle and the source dataset.

FAQ — Feature score of Paid Plans

What is the best model for Feature score of Paid Plans in 2026?

null by null currently leads the Feature score of Paid Plans ranking with a score of 5.70, the highest value in this dataset across AI Chatbots. AI Battle aggregates the dataset from its public source and re-checks it daily.

How often is the Feature score of Paid Plans ranking updated?

The Feature score of Paid Plans ranking is rebuilt daily from the upstream public dataset. Scores are the source dataset's own published values, so positions track whatever that source last released — each ranking page names the dataset it comes from.

Which models rank in the top 3 for Feature score of Paid Plans?

The top 3 are: 1. null (5.70), 2. null (5.70), 3. null (5.60).

All AI Battle Rankings

Directories